A Lament

There may always be two heros: he who triumphs "'the absolute value' of human life" at the wreckage of a terrorist attack and will send a flood to dilute any derision with vengeance; the other who terminates the man willing to elect an army and deport the youth of the nation. (Or as it is so portrayed in the manifestos of Mikhail Bakunin and Nikolai Morozov.)

Every radical is an extreme extension of the circumstances of his environment. Caring for an environment en radiation involves nausea and financial strain, but the greatest hardship of all is ensuring the environment that not only has the tumor been removed, but so too was the environment addressed that allowed the tumor it's membrane and nourishment. (Membrane, because concealed within, the tumor was stable and allowed space to grow, to further mutate its distinction.)

(Is this the mindset of those biodynamic farmers practicing in Ireland? --In that, by common regard, they're allowed space to further their personal ideologies about the universe and the conversations between the like-minded and otherwise establishes both distinction and their allowance to mutate. Divergent of terrorism or revolution by terroristic terms, these people do not intend to use violence, and are therefore allowed their space.)

[Edit]

I’m tired of physics. But let me explain—

My professor echoed our assigned passage from the night before:

Rope is placed before two men. One end falls before Mini Me, the other before Arnold Schwarzenegger. At the whistle, the men take up the rope and pull in a classic game of ‘Tug-of-War”. Clearly Mini Me is no match for the Terminator in this test of strength. Further, Arnold only exerts as much strength or force as exerted by Mini Me to keep the rope in place. To win the match, Mini Me requires only that Arnold equal his strength plus 1. Mini Me may muster the greatest strength of his ability, but Arnold does not.

This is illustrative of my frustration with an eye for an eye, with tyrants requiring tyrants to rid a society of tyranny, of a revolution to undermine the revolution, of a counter-terrorist for a terrorist. The prescription in highest demand among a people insistent upon studying history and highlighting main events as red lanterns strung between “now” and “then” is homeopathy, a system of likes.

Systematic terrorism as revolutionary is a condition by all those involved. The enactment of terrorism by rule of law against those represented by such authority calls for the same measure in the reproach or revolution. If establishing power is the only service provided to the people under law them those people must pool their allotment of resources (mostly, organization, vitality, and gunpowder) and rise to power. The impact of such a situation upon society is usually drawn out through several generations of repression and suffering; a condition conducive to achieving no greater innovation than access to basic needs.

According to Sergei Nechaev, a revolutionary must compile a wanted list of persons compiled according to how such extraction will further the cause for revolution (and, at which speed the revolution will take full form). The equation is as follows:

-Force of revolution in certain time = #10 person to further cause of revolution

-Greater force of revolution (thus gained from the sacrifice or extraction of #10 from society) at a later time = #9 person whose death would further the cause of revolution; and so on…

It’s a matter of physics and is a proclamation of history as ‘homeopathic’.

(Excuse me, we're proclamating here, "Homeopathic![!!!!]"

[I’ve always wondered if the moon ever exerts the greatest strength of its ability when placed within in relation with the ocean (and vice versa)… Is a monsoon an example of the force of the moon = the force of the ocean, plus 1? Who was it that mentioned that physics can teach you nothing about the human condition?]